Negative actions of Lance Armstrong made him finalist for “Texan of the Year” award

The Dallas Morning News is a daily newspaper that is quite popular in the USA. Several individuals whose deeds have significant influence on the society are chosen each year for the “Texan of the Year” award. It is necessary to note that not just positive actions are considered. Even deeds that have been influenced on the society negatively may induce receiving the “Texan of the Year” award. So, Lance Armstrong’s doping case made the cyclist the finalist for the “Texan of the Year” award.
As you understand, Lance Armstrong’s doping case is not pleasant. However this scandal disgraced the celebrated American cyclist, it made him more prominent. The doping case had significant impact on the society. A lot of persons discussed the situation connected with his administration of anabolic steroids, EPO and other related preparations. Numerous individuals focused on the following questions: “Have Lance Armstrong really administered doping products?”, Why has he cheated?”, Which preparations have been applied by him?”, How could he avoid detection?”, etc.
The Dallas Morning News didn’t fail to describe positive deed of Lance Armstrong as well. The newspaper mentioned about efforts of the cyclist for the foundation that helps persons with cancer to survive. The athlete also induced developing centers for researches related to treatment of cancer. The Dallas Morning News noted also about accomplishments of the athlete which were done during his cycling career. Since young age Lance Armstrong succeeded in cycling. He obtained many awards. Lance Armstrong got 7 Tour de France titles.
Even testicular cancer couldn’t have negative influence on the prominent cyclist. However the cancer spread over the body, Lance Armstrong got rid of this dreadful trouble. Furthermore, he came back to professional cycling after his treatment and continued to succeed. While all positive deeds of Lance Armstrong didn’t make him a finalist for the “Texan of the Year” award, his doping scandal did it. Undoubtedly, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) contributed to his award. A dossier on Lance Armstrong’s doping case was released by the USADA. Moreover, the cyclist’s sponsors dropped him after it was proven that he had doped. Thus, many persons were convinced that the cyclist had administered banned substances.
Texans praised Lance Armstrong, when he succeeded in sports. But when this sportsman fell down, they began to demonize him. It is not surprisingly because this is the nature of Texans. While they like to make some persons heroes, they like to blame them too.