California lawmakers try to protect rights of athletes

Lawmakers of California state that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspeople suspected of steroid use. So, athletes that have never tested positive for any banned medicines are targeted. That’s why the lawmakers presented a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored chiefly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars each year. This governmental office induces fighting against intake of prohibited drugs. Its goal is to eradicate illegal manufacture and drug use, crimes related to administration of illegal drugs, etc.
The request of California lawmakers was initiated soon after the 7-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime suspension from professional sports.
Everybody knows that the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong has forfeited his 7 titles won at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions completely.
Summer Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t desire to accept the lawsuit. He claimed that the USADA acted correctly. The judge also said that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from sportspersons who apply banned substances.
California Senator Michael Rubio confirmed that Sam Sparks didn’t act appropriately, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. Thus, the senators claimed that the USADA violated rights of some sportspersons. That’s why they asked the Congress to review the issue.

Barry Bonds sympathizes and supports Lance Armstrong

Barry Bonds knows what a sportsperson experiences, when he/she is pursued by the government and anti-doping agencies. He understands what this individual feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspeople suspected of doping. So, Barry Bonds supports the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a reporter asked Barry Bonds about problems of Lance Armstrong connected with doping accusations. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He affirmed that Lance Armstrong was the most brilliant cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Undoubtedly, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He understands what it means to be a good cyclist. After this person retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He took part in some competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, Barry Bonds sees that this sport has the same troubles like baseball. He comprehends that cyclists are pursued by federal prosecutors and anti-doping agencies like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were pursued by feds and anti-doping officials.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about intake of prohibited medicines and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the athlete lied about usage of forbidden medications. But feds claimed that he was guilty of obstructing justice. Barry Bonds decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to pursue the cyclist. The USADA confirmed that Lance Armstrong had been applying banned substances throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to stop fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He was stripped of his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
However Lance Armstrong lost his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They affirm that he is the most brilliant cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors haven’t refused to support his cancer charity. The seven-time Tour de France winner helps people to fight against cancer. Thus, numerous individuals are thankful. They will never forget what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by accusations related to usage of forbidden medicines. The former baseball player hopes that his achievements during the baseball career are more essential than the accusations. He believes that people will forget about the suspicions and he will be claimed to be a baseball star.

Belarusian medalist must serve one-year ban

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk received the gold medal at the 2012 Olympic Games. But she tested positive for a steroid. As a result, she lost the medal that was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests showed that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If a sportsperson is caught using any banned preparations, he/she is usually sentenced to a ban of two years. When it comes to Nadezya Ostapchuk, she received one-year ban. Why was the sentence lighter? There were some circumstances that proved the following aspect: the shop putter didn’t administer any banned medicine knowingly.
At the beginning Nadezya Ostapchuk blamed his former coach. She said that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency investigated this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also participated in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person added powder of methenolone into food of the shot putter during the last week before the 2012 Summer Olympics. The coach confirmed that he had worried about the shot putter. He believed that this steroid would help to win.
Actually, it is difficult to determine why Yefimov has done it. He only made the things worse.
Anti-doping agencies accepted these affirmations. That’s why Nadezya Ostapchuk was sentenced just to one-year ban.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that the Belarusian shot putter had not used the steroid intentionally. They claimed that Yefimov just tried to protect the shot putter. They claimed that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If Nadezya Ostapchuk’s performance was amazing several months before the 2012 London Olympics, her coach had to be sure that she would win. Why did he trouble about?

Feds: erectile dysfunctions and testicular atrophy prove that certain athletes have doped

Some athletes who are accused of steroid use become targets of the government. Federal prosecutors do almost everything in order to learn whether certain athletes have used any performance-enhancing drugs. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this purpose. Much money is spent to reveal even private life of sportspersons. According to the government, certain details of their private behavior can disclose the truth about application of banned medicines. So, girlfriends of several sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been disclosed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about some details linked with private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about size of testicles of this athlete. She reported that the athlete’s testicles were shrunken. So, her answer served as an argument that Barry Bonds applied steroids and/or other prohibited products.
It is known that testicular atrophy is included in undesirable results of some steroids. Thus, the government decided to find out whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is an unreliable argument in order to prove that anyone has used several forbidden medicines. Consumers of steroids may avoid this undesirable consequence, if they use some drugs for this purpose.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former athlete had experienced erectile dysfunctions. The woman confirmed that sometimes Roger Clemens had suffered from this problem.
As for erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during administration of steroids. But if you study information about unwanted results of steroids more attentively, you can understand that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of usage. It happens because natural production of testosterone is usually suppressed by application of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medicines which can regenerate natural production of testosterone, erectile dysfunctions can be prevented.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also targeted by feds. But questions are not disclosed. According to several suggestions, she might have been asked also about sexual abilities of the cyclist.
Actually, federal prosecutors have a wrong opinion in this case. Although shrinkage of testicles and erectile dysfunctions may appear on account of steroid use, these arguments are not proper.

Don Hooton: steroids can cause serious adverse reactions

Certain medicines are called “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these products represent? Why have been they named “performance-enhancing”? Various individuals may have different definitions. Let mention what an adolescent believes! Before presenting her point of view it is important to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, had serious depression after intake of steroids. Finally, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other prominent sportspersons that have used steroids. But his life ended suddenly. His sister affirms that performance-enhancing drugs are unsafe preparations. They are called “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young people who want to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about dangers connected with steroids. He describes which dangers are associated with administration of anabolic steroids and other related medications. He also utilizes slideshow presentations in order to explain that these drugs can cause such problems, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver dysfunctions, etc.
Don Hooton put efforts to educate young individuals about grave risks linked with intake of steroids. But he realizes that it is difficult. He claims that a lot of young individuals take doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they desire to look like them. They follow their examples in order to change appearance and have more endurance.
Unluckily, some parents think that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them think that their daughters don’t apply steroids because these products are recommended to add muscles and body weight in general. But according to some sources, girls also apply steroids. They use these drugs in order to lose fat. Several parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also taken to burn fat. That’s why adults also should be taught about effects of steroids. Moreover, some parents believe that their children don’t apply steroids because these medications are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to obtain steroids for a cycle.
It is stated that every16th high school student administers steroids. But this point of view is mistaken. Every 16th high school student admits to taking performance-enhancing drugs.   But many young individuals hide that they take these drugs.
Those that listen to Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids express their thanks. They are happy that they get knowledge about these medications.

Hypocrites continue fighting against steroids

It is known that anabolic steroids are frequently demonized. If a sportsperson or a bodybuilder applies steroids and/or other doping products, he/she is claimed to be a cheater. Sportswriters report about such athletes as about those who have destructed their reputation. Anti-doping officers put great efforts and spend money in other to define whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that certain sportspersons have taken steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is affirmed that those that dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Many articles describe the war on steroids. But let think whether arguments against administration of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to apply them.
It is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons serve as a bad example for children and young persons. It is known that youth sees a lot of sports stars that use steroids and other related medicines. As a result, young individuals desire to look and be as strong, as these prominent sports figures.  Moreover, it is widely discussed about health risks linked with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can understand that these arguments are weak because they are full of hypocrisy.
Let examine the most spread arguments against application of anabolic steroids and/or other related preparations.
According to the first argument, application of steroids is closely associated with several probable health risks. Many articles warn about atrophy of testicles and enlarged heart that may occur on account of steroid use. Although it may be true, let analyze our life. We consume unhealthy food, although we know that it destroys our health. Some individuals administer antidepressants that are also very dangerous. We are also involved in other unhealthy activities.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using athletes take unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they improve performance with these products. Let see what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  A lot of actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play several roles in movies. They also take unfair advantages over others with the help of several surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to bans.
While it is affirmed that steroid-using sportspersons send bad messages to young persons that want to look like them and follow their examples, no one mentions about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also want to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal agents pursue athletes that apply steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act like steroid-using athletes.
It is clear that arguments against application of steroids are very weak. They show hypocrisy which reigns in our counterfeit world.

It is strange that Nadzeya Ostapchuk has used metenolone

The Belarusian shot putter Nadzeya Ostapchuk won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But she lost the medal because she failed a drug test. She was asked to provide two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read news linked with doping, you must know that competitive sportspeople and bodybuilders are usually caught taking other steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. But as for Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught taking metenolone. It is strange, according to words of anti-doping officers. What does this prohibited product represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily apply this product for increase of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It possesses weak androgenic features. It works like testosterone, enhancing muscle mass and adding strength.
However this product has just weak androgenic nature, it leads to development of sex male characteristics in women. Females who take this medicine may face usual effects of virilization: the voice deepens; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This product may be administered orally or injectionally.
Metenolone (Methenolone) benefits greatly, when it is administered by sportspeople during their workouts. It is not taken during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is administered just on the day of a competition.
It is also affirmed that it is easy to catch those who administer this anabolic steroid.
Adverse effects of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend on doses that are takne. They are following: water retention, hypercalcaemia, bone growth, excessive hair growth on the body, acne formation, male-pattern baldness, irregularities of menstrual cycles, increased sex drive, etc.
So, when you see a female athlete that has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may accuse her of doping. Actually, it is wrong because these troubles may occur also in those females who don’t take any steroids. But sometimes these effects demonstrate that certain female athletes administer drugs which have androgenic nature.

Australian physician prescribed steroids to patients that didn’t have medical needs to use these drugs

Certain doctors abuse their position, prescribing medicines that don’t meet criteria of therapeutic needs of patients. Why does it happen? It is known that several drugs are considered to be prescription drugs. It means that you can’t obtain them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such medications. It is illegal to purchase steroids without a prescription in certain countries. Those who do it may be punished. They may be enforced to pay a fine and/or go to prison. Undoubtedly, a lot of people seek methods to get and apply these preparations without having legal problems.
Anabolic steroids are frequently abused. A lot of sportspersons and bodybuilders use these products not for clinical needs but for increase of performance. If they live in countries where these preparations can’t be purchased legally without prescriptions, they find certain ways to mask their illicit purchase and administration. Sportspeople, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their health care providers to prescribe them these drugs, as if they had clinical needs to administer them. So, several doctors promote selling anabolic steroids to those that abuse them. Here is a case.
Peter Grant, an Australian doctor, prescribed steroids to 14 individuals during 9 years. Medical state of these persons didn’t require application of these products. So, the physician was accused of improper practicing medicine. For example, he prescribed to a patient applying such medicines, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to recommend these drugs to this man. Moreover, these medications were prescribed him during nine years.
The health care provider Peter Grant acknowledged that some patients were competing. So, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to studying scientific literature about anabolic steroids. He affirmed that he knew how steroids worked. So, he supervised the patients that applied anabolic steroids.
Taking these factors in consideration, it is possible to state that the physician Peter Grant was better known by those who applied steroids for performance-enhancing effects than by those who had to be treated from certain health troubles. Peter Grant confirmed that he knew that steroids were bought by his patients only for personal administration.
When the doctor appeared in the court, the judge affirmed that the physician induced selling steroids. The judge confirmed that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for a year. Furthermore, the judge confirmed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Sheryl Crow was Lance Armstrong’s girlfriend, when he won Tour de France last time

Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the sportsperson had administered EPO and other banned medications.
Numerous persons provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation linked with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the athlete was also targeted. She had to appear in the court. Several sports journalists confirmed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by federal prosecutors.
Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow were claimed to be one of the most famous couples. They spent a lot of time together. Sheryl Crow lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with Lance Armstrong during his workouts. They were in a close relationship, when the cyclist won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton said that Lance Armstrong had administered prohibited preparations. They also stated that the cyclist had been the leader of a doping team. In addition to these statements, they declared that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment used for application of forbidden drugs. These individuals were going to testify against Lance Armstrong. They claimed that Lance Armstrong had won Tour de France 7 times because of performance-enhancing drugs.
As for Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the sportsperson was dropped prior to the hearing.
While federal prosecutors dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former cyclist. As a result, Lance Armstrong lost his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Fortunately, his charity against cancer was not destroyed. Sponsors continue to support him and donate. However his titles are forfeited, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many people in their efforts against cancer.

Skip Bayless doesn’t have any proper basis to accuse Derek Jeter of doping

The sports journalist Skip Bayless accuses Derek Jeter, a baseball player, of steroid use. He has expressed his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
In fact, the ESPN2 journalist doesn’t have any evidence in order to suppose that Derek Jeter takes forbidden medications. Despites this fact, the affirmations of the journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, the sports journalist started to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He claimed that the MLB’s tests for performance-enhancing drugs are not good enough to catch those that administer forbidden medicines.
The sports journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view related to testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test which is utilized in the MLB. This method is not good enough to detect those that use banned preparations. Instead of this method, it is necessary to use another. Carbon isotope ratio is more appropriate.
The ESPN2 journalist also noted that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this medicine is performed in the MLB just once per year. But blood tests for this drug should be performed more times during year. Otherwise, players may use this product and remain undetectable.
So, the journalist thinks that Derek Jeter administers HGH and banned products. The journalist also confirms that if he were a baseball player, he would choose HGH.
Thus, Skip Bayless supposes that MLB players use HGH and probably other banned medicines without being caught by anti-doping officers.
It is quite obvious that the steroid era in baseball has not ended. Professional baseball players apply different forbidden medications and avoid detection. But nobody can accuse an athlete of steroid use, basing only on unsophisticated drug testing. It is necessary to focus on facts, accusing a person of usage of forbidden medicines. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

Unsuccessful defense of Melky Cabrera

It happens frequently that when sportspersons test positive for any prohibited substances, they try to prove that they have never used any banned product intentionally. They are looking for different ways to demonstrate that they are not guilty. They do a lot in order to avoid bans and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for the anabolic steroid testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other sportspersons he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and avoid the suspension.
A lot of doping sportspeople that are caught confirm that they have administered a dietary supplement that caused positive for certain forbidden substance. Although several athletes may have used contaminated dietary supplements, numerous athletes apply steroids and choose this way of defense because it works in numerous cases.
So, Melky Cabrera claimed that he had applied a dietary supplement which caused his positive for testosterone. Actually, it was a hoax. Trying to escape from the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements which promoted selling it. The supplement didn’t exist in reality. It was just a lie of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), created the web site.
But the lie turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. So, the baseball player was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES was also troubled. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were suspected of involving in the hoax. But these individuals affirmed that they were not implicated in the creation of the site and the hoax that was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been implicated in this hoax.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is not clear yet whether other persons would be also prosecuted and punished for the hoax.

Usage of corticosteroids by prostitutes

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection arrested four men who possessed the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam desired to smuggle these preparations to Bangladesh. The medications were confiscated and these men were arrested.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this situation, confirming that 4 individuals were detained while they tried to smuggle steroids that were intended for administration by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This piece of news surprised numerous persons. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper inform about? Do prostitutes apply the same drugs like athletes and bodybuilder that try to improve their performance, enhancing muscle mass and strength? Why do prostitutes use anabolic steroids? Which is the goal?
Some individuals understood that it was wrong to suppose that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Of course, prostitutes don’t use anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes take corticosteroids which differ from anabolic steroids entirely. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They have capacity to improve performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids promote enhancing muscle mass and reduce fat deposits, corticosteroids promote wasting muscles and increase body fat levels.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids taken by prostitutes. Those that use this medicine look healthier and more attractive. Thus, such prostitutes who take this medication have more clients.
A prostitute that takes Orexadon notes that she is able to serve up to 15 clients a day.
Thus, it is possible to confirm that prostitutes don’t take anabolic steroids that are usually recommended for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more proper products for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper published a false piece of news. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t try to smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Usage of Clomid during/after steroid cycles

When you purchase steroids for cycles, you should also prepare such preparations that must be used to receive recovery after application of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG must be taken during the cycle. It is important to take into account that this drug is applied just during steroid use.
There such preparations which should be taken after steroid use. For example, Clomid should be taken after steroid cycles. It is necessary to start administering this medication after androgen levels fall substantially and recovery with this medicine becomes possible. It is ordinarily advised to start administering Clomid with an increased dosage (300 mg/day) and reduce it gradually till 50 mg daily. Then decreased dosages are applied until steroid users are sure that natural secretion of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their normal size.
If Clomid is used circa 6 weeks and no improvement is seen, it is needed to interrupt administration of this preparation. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is needed to continue applying Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to take this medication a year. Certain studies have displayed that long-term administration of this medication doesn’t result in severe problems. However certain individuals may experience vision problems because of Clomid, these troubles are not permanent. They disappear after discontinuation of usage. If any troubles connected with vision system appear in those that administer Clomid, they must discontinue taking this preparation.
Clomid may be also used after steroid use. A normal dose is 75 mg daily in such situations.
Although there are such remedies that help to get recovery after steroid cycles and keep strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to apply prolonged steroid cycles.

Which drug is better: Clomid vs Nolvadex?

A lot of persons frequently ask which drug is more suitable for a PCT: Clomid vs Nolvadex. While several steroid users confirm that Clomid is better for this purpose, others affirm that Nolvadex is more proper. Certain persons confirm that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you evaluate structures of these drugs, you may see that they possess similar structures. That’s why they have some similar properties. But the most of persons and even specialists claim that Clomid and Nolvadex are wholly different medicines. Which basis does this opinion have? These products are utilized in medicine for various needs. Nolvadex is recommended for treatment of breast cancer in females. When it comes to Clomid, it is applied in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are wholly different medications.
In fact, they may be also administered for different purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is advised in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is normally utilized as an anti-estrogen remedy.
Comparing potency of these products, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen compound than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex are capable to lower levels of estrogen, stimulating hypothalamus to produce greater quantities of testosterone.
When it comes to doses of these preparations, they are different because one of them is weaker than another. Clomid should be utilized in more increased measures. So, such dosages of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, cause greater effects than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most potent anti-estrogen. Such medications, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more potent but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be applied together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are ordinarily used in case of gynecomastia.
When you try to choose which product you should administer: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account several aspects.
Nolvadex influences on cholesterol levels positively. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noticed, Nolvadex is more powerful than Clomid. In addition to these advantages, Nolvadex is safer. Furthermore, Nolvadex causes less dangerous undesirable effects than Clomid because more reduced doses are required to cause good results. Moreover, while side reactions of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of application. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to keep more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, consumers of steroids can make their choice correctly.